Posted Nov 30, 2009 23:53 UTC (Mon) by bojan (subscriber, #14302)
Parent article: Between Fedora 12 and 13
I guess the experience depends on the hardware as well. For me, F-12 is a major regression:
- 3D graphics doesn't work without KMS
- 3D graphics + KMS + hibernate/thaw or suspend/resume crashes the system
- my network keeps disconnecting
Yeah, I got hit big time, because I have Intel 945GM/GMS graphics and Broadcom BCM4401-B0 NIC. So, several times a day, I have to start my network card again. And, of course, I have to suffer through slowness of 2D and metacity, instead of having smooth 3D graphics and compiz.
YMMV, as they say. But, I'll suffer through it until it gets fixed - it's not the end of the world.
Also, kernels after -155 appear to have the fix. Will test.
Depends
Posted Dec 4, 2009 21:37 UTC (Fri) by Tet (subscriber, #5433)
[Link]
For me, F-12 is a major regression
Heh. For me it's the total opposite. It's a huge step forward. F10 and F11 were dire releases, and I was seriously thinking of looking elsewhere. But F12 is the best release for a while, and is enough to keep me on Fedora for now. Yes, there are problems. KMS doesn't work, and audio doesn't work out of the box. But I can get it to the point where I can do the basics (read my email, surf the web, print, listen to music) with only minor hiccoughs. With F10 and F11, I couldn't get that far, no matter how much effort I put in. I'm starting to think Fedora works in cycles of threes. FC6 was great, F9 was OK and F12 is looking good for me. I just hope I don't have to wait until F15 to get another decent one.
Depends
Posted Dec 5, 2009 0:24 UTC (Sat) by nix (subscriber, #2304)
[Link]
"The [Fedorans] did everything in threes."
Depends
Posted Dec 10, 2009 14:52 UTC (Thu) by fatrat (subscriber, #1518)
[Link]