| |||||||||||||
Still no Canonical?Still no Canonical?Posted Nov 25, 2009 22:03 UTC (Wed) by gregkh (subscriber, #8)In reply to: Still no Canonical? by hppnq Parent article: Who wrote 2.6.32
Already fixed and in the linux-next tree. See: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/11/11/336 for details.
(Log in to post comments)
Still no Canonical? Posted Nov 25, 2009 22:05 UTC (Wed) by rahulsundaram (subscriber, #21946) [Link]
|
|||||||||||||