Letters to the editor [LWN.net]

Letters to the editor

Posted Jun 27, 2002 11:09 UTC (Thu) by BogusUser ((unknown), #2307)
In reply to: Letters to the editor by BogusUser
Parent article: Letters to the editor

I have to agree with dinotrac. I've been reading LWN since the beggining,
and I've never participated in the discussion. It feels quite exciting
actually - I don't have a /. account, but I can imagine a higher quality
of discussion developing here, (in less volume - also a good thing).

Having said that, I can't think of anything interesting to say :-)

(Log in to post comments)

High quality discussion

Posted Jun 27, 2002 12:14 UTC (Thu) by leonbrooks (guest, #1494) [Link]

I can imagine a higher quality of discussion developing here

I think the absence of an `anonymous cowherd' class has a lot to do with that. Still, ACs occasionally contribute very insightful things. I guess the other /. ACs are just there to herd-protect the valuable ones...