Does SCO own read-copy-update?
Posted Jun 13, 2003 18:52 UTC (Fri) by torsten
In reply to: Does SCO own read-copy-update?
Parent article: Does SCO own read-copy-update?
Second, the terms of the Project Monterey contract needs to be made public, especially if exclusive rights of code were made.
SCO has, from the beginning, stated that IBM violated their mutual contract by breaking off from the Monterrey project to develop Linux. I think the interpretation of the contract from the Monterrey project will be the defining factor of infringement.
The only real problem for IBM is if they already agreed not to share Monterrey code outside of that project, and are still bound by that agreement. We'll see.
to post comments)