| |||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||
An open letter to SCOAn open letter to SCOPosted Jun 13, 2003 18:06 UTC (Fri) by duncan (guest, #8429)Parent article: An open letter to SCO Would anyone who has purchased SCO Linux, and thereby received allegedly contaminated GPL source code that SCO now believes/claims cannot safely be redistributed, have any legal standing to demand that SCO reveal details of the alleged contamination? i.e., if SCO became "aware" that it had distributed code that it now believes cannot be propertly redistributed, wouldn't it have some obligation to provide detailed information, without any NDA, to those it sold SCO Linux to? (Of course, the detailed allegations will presumably emerge long before any such legal claim would be adjudicated.)
(Log in to post comments)
|
|||||||||||