Advertisement
Interested in hardware, diags, validation, Linux, C, ARM, Microcode and low level programming and blazing networks?
| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
Courgette meets a dangerous (Red) BendCourgette meets a dangerous (Red) BendPosted Nov 12, 2009 19:06 UTC (Thu) by jrigg (guest, #30848)In reply to: Courgette meets a dangerous (Red) Bend by gmaxwell Parent article: Courgette meets a dangerous (Red) Bend
> At high enough rates with well well enough done methods it exceeds the limits of human perception and produces results which are not ABX-able.
I have yet to hear such a thing from mp3, but I agree it would be possible using a good enough method.
> This is relevant because your model of lossless=perfect, lossy=bad brings about unreasonable conclusions.
Actually my model for compression is: audible=bad, inaudible=good.
It can be argued that the principle of perceptually weighted compression is obvious to a practitioner in the art, but then I think the same applies to many patents. In practice the criterion often seems to be whether or not it is obvious to the patent examiner.
(Log in to post comments)
|
|
||||||||||||