| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
Documented?Documented?Posted Nov 11, 2009 17:03 UTC (Wed) by nix (subscriber, #2304)In reply to: Documented? by drag Parent article: GNOME 3.0 in September 2010
We have a homebrewed version-control system at work. It has excellent documentation but does not support branches or directories and takes >30s to check out a single file.
I prefer git, not-very-nice documentation though it may have.
(Log in to post comments)
Documented? Posted Nov 11, 2009 17:08 UTC (Wed) by nye (guest, #51576) [Link]
Hmm. I consider git to be one of the better documented open source programs, since documentation is extensive and includes numerous examples, often including discussion of what options are for (one of the things I hate is documentation with entries like "--enable-frobnobulator - sets whether or not you want the frobnobulator enabled". Well thanks *so much* for that helpful tip).
|
|
||||||||||||