| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
Stable kernels 2.6.31.6 and 2.6.27.39 releasedStable kernels 2.6.31.6 and 2.6.27.39 releasedPosted Nov 11, 2009 11:18 UTC (Wed) by smadu2 (subscriber, #54943)In reply to: Stable kernels 2.6.31.6 and 2.6.27.39 released by madscientist Parent article: Stable kernels 2.6.31.6 and 2.6.27.39 released
I thought Redhat usually goes with LTS kernels like 2.6.27 no ?
(Log in to post comments)
Stable kernels 2.6.31.6 and 2.6.27.39 released Posted Nov 11, 2009 12:12 UTC (Wed) by jengelh (subscriber, #33263) [Link]
RedHat? They are at 2.6.18 *right now*.
Stable kernels 2.6.31.6 and 2.6.27.39 released Posted Nov 11, 2009 12:20 UTC (Wed) by smadu2 (subscriber, #54943) [Link]
Sorry I meant their next EL version. Dont they usually stick with LTS kernels was my question.
Stable kernels 2.6.31.6 and 2.6.27.39 released Posted Nov 11, 2009 13:54 UTC (Wed) by rahulsundaram (subscriber, #21946) [Link]
No. Red Hat has to maintain a single kernel version for 7 to 10 years. Upstream is never going to do that.
Stable kernels 2.6.31.6 and 2.6.27.39 released Posted Nov 11, 2009 14:26 UTC (Wed) by smadu2 (subscriber, #54943) [Link]
I am not sure if I can ask the question but do you know what kernel the next EL of Redhat is going to be based on ? Is it 2.6.31 based as somebody above mentioned ?
Stable kernels 2.6.31.6 and 2.6.27.39 released Posted Nov 11, 2009 14:37 UTC (Wed) by rahulsundaram (subscriber, #21946) [Link]
Can't comment on that. There is no public information from Red Hat on that yet.
Stable kernels 2.6.31.6 and 2.6.27.39 released Posted Nov 11, 2009 15:04 UTC (Wed) by smadu2 (subscriber, #54943) [Link]
I understand, thanks.
|
|
||||||||||||