| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
Stable kernels 2.6.31.6 and 2.6.27.39 releasedStable kernels 2.6.31.6 and 2.6.27.39 releasedPosted Nov 10, 2009 22:16 UTC (Tue) by PaXTeam (subscriber, #24616)In reply to: Stable kernels 2.6.31.6 and 2.6.27.39 released by flewellyn Parent article: Stable kernels 2.6.31.6 and 2.6.27.39 released
> They mentioned several CVEs;
you mean all two of them and the least relevant ones at that? ;)
> the omission of that one is likely an oversight.
you mean after exploits have been out in the public, hit /. and others. do you realize that this bug is one of the most serious ones in a long time, affecting probably a decade's worth of kernels?
> Really, you should stop assuming bad faith on the part of the kernel devs.
who said i was assuming anything? the facts speak for themselves and i will continue to point them out whether you like it or not.
(Log in to post comments)
Stable kernels 2.6.31.6 and 2.6.27.39 released Posted Nov 10, 2009 23:05 UTC (Tue) by flewellyn (subscriber, #5047) [Link]
What do you want them to do, then?
Stable kernels 2.6.31.6 and 2.6.27.39 released Posted Nov 11, 2009 14:58 UTC (Wed) by drag (subscriber, #31333) [Link]
Probably mention serious security fixes better so that people like I don't
have to wait for PaXTeam to point out issues like this one. :)
I mean; wouldn't it be nice to be able to trust what the kernel releases
|
|
||||||||||||