I fear that the court will do what they often do, which is to issue a narrow ruling. They'll throw out this patent, with language that disallows a bunch of other "business method" patents. For example, Priceline has patented the concept of doing a reverse auction with a computer, if I understand correctly. That's probably dead. But the ruling will be narrow enough to leave software patents for future rulings (neither blessed by the court nor thrown out by the court).
<p>
The reason they might go in that direction is that they are worried about the consequences of just doing what the SFLC is arguing for: they probably have so many friend-of-the-court briefings predicting disaster that the might try to avoid just killing all software patents.
Analysis: The "Lorenzo Jones" case emerges (SCOTUS Blog)
Posted Nov 10, 2009 18:43 UTC (Tue) by Topaz (guest, #60130)
[Link]
Small steps are better than no progress at all. A case against business methods should weaken all patents based solely on methods or ideas. Is software code a machine? The reasonable answer is 'definitely not'.
Amicus briefs
Posted Nov 10, 2009 21:42 UTC (Tue) by markhb (guest, #1003)
[Link]
Scotuswiki (affiliated with SCOTUSBlog) has PDF's of all the Amicus briefs here.