| |||||||||||||
JLS2009: A Btrfs updateJLS2009: A Btrfs updatePosted Nov 2, 2009 19:11 UTC (Mon) by foom (subscriber, #14868)In reply to: JLS2009: A Btrfs update by mjg59 Parent article: JLS2009: A Btrfs update
Of course the kernel shouldn't make such assumptions by itself, but if the user configures it
intentionally to break fsync...
What difference does it make if it's implemented in the kernel or in an LD_PRELOAD library?
(Log in to post comments)
JLS2009: A Btrfs update Posted Nov 2, 2009 19:17 UTC (Mon) by mjg59 (subscriber, #23239) [Link]
It lets you control it per-application.
|
|||||||||||||