Advertisement
Interested in hardware, diags, validation, Linux, C, ARM, Microcode and low level programming and blazing networks?
| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
Battery charging "logic"Battery charging "logic"Posted Oct 22, 2009 14:28 UTC (Thu) by forthy (guest, #1525)In reply to: OMAP, N900 and openness by laf0rge Parent article: Maemo Summit 2009: Fremantle, Harmattan, and N900
Having seen the data sheets of several battery charger chips for mobile phones, I can't see what's that fuzz about (the data sheets are available). These chips have an extremely simple interface: three logic pins, all open drain logic: enable, power present, charging. There's little possible magic behind driving these three pins. What's more interesting is a charge tracking circuit - and the code behind that. That code might have patented algorithms inside, so it's probably not easy to release it.
(Log in to post comments)
Battery charging "logic" Posted Oct 24, 2009 10:14 UTC (Sat) by nix (subscriber, #2304) [Link]
The people who sell those circuits also claim that they are protected for
health and safety reasons: if they released the code and someone changed it and a battery exploded...
... and that's why nobody ever uses Linux or free software in
(But perhaps that's not entirely 100% accurate.)
Battery charging "logic" Posted Oct 24, 2009 21:11 UTC (Sat) by anselm (subscriber, #2796) [Link] It turns out that the Microsoft EULA doesn't allow you to use Windows in life-or-death situations, such as nuclear plant or air traffic control. This tells us that Microsoft doesn't think their own code is good enough for these applications -- at least not to the point of putting their money on it. On the other hand, nobody ever successfully sued Microsoft over a bug in their software.
|
|
||||||||||||