"On the red herring, it's my understanding that those 22 patents were offered to both Red Hat and IBM individually before they were sold to Allied Securities Trust, a non-profit that counts both Red Hat and IBM among its members."
Sam's understanding seems incorrect since he seems to have confused AST and OIN. I looked and couldn't find any information that Red Hat is a member of AST and in fact AST membership requirements would exclude Red Hat
I find it difficult to believe that Microsoft were intending be malicious by selling their patents to a defensive patent trust (which is what AST is). It sounds more like - to me - they tried selling the patents individually first and ended up having to auction them as a lot later. Which basically infers that there isn't a lot of value in these patents.
AST and Red Hat
Posted Oct 18, 2009 20:38 UTC (Sun) by BrucePerens (subscriber, #2510)
[Link]
Except that Microsoft didn't have to sell their patents. Especially patents that effect Linux and Open Source software. They aren't really short of money, although they've tightened their belt a bit they still have around 20 Billion of cash and short-term investments, and longer-term assets worth more. So, I still don't believe much of what we are being told about this.