LWN.net Logo

Is Gnome dead?

Is Gnome dead?

Posted Oct 12, 2009 13:43 UTC (Mon) by jond (subscriber, #37669)
In reply to: Is Gnome dead? by rahulsundaram
Parent article: Nokia ports Qt to Maemo 5 (the Inquirer)

I think the problem isn't defined clearly enough to be discussed. GTK and QT
are a collection of different things. GTK includes a rendering framework
which is pluggable, and indeed there is a QT engine plugin, or at least
there used to be). I used it for a little while as I tend to prefer GNOME
and GTK applications to KDE ones but I prefer the appearance and speed of
QT's rendering. It proved to not be particularly stable / didn't play well
with certain themes etc. which I suppose was inevitable. But, should there
be a decision for GNOME to migrate to QT, it might be a first step.


(Log in to post comments)

Is Gnome dead?

Posted Oct 12, 2009 20:21 UTC (Mon) by drag (subscriber, #31333) [Link]

The important thing for Gnome is not the toolkit, but the applications.

That is the most important thing for any platform and is why KDE4 crapped out
early on. No apps means completely worthless.

So unless you want to have the Ubuntu desktop be a completely unusable for
the 3 years while people sort out the mess of dropping support for 90% of the
applications that people use on Ubuntu then it is probably a better idea to
just keep improving Gnome incrementally.

Copyright © 2013, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds