| |||||||||||||
In defense of per-BDI writebackIn defense of per-BDI writebackPosted Oct 11, 2009 6:30 UTC (Sun) by mfedyk (guest, #55303)In reply to: In defense of per-BDI writeback by anton Parent article: In defense of per-BDI writeback
I was doing a similar test, but over network filesystems (cifs in this case -- centos5 on both sides).
If I copied files with cp or mv, I noticed a marked improvement in throughput compared to the gnome file manager.
Try it again with mv or cp and see if there is a difference.
(Log in to post comments)
In defense of per-BDI writeback Posted Oct 11, 2009 12:59 UTC (Sun) by anton (guest, #25547) [Link] I did use cp.
|
|||||||||||||