| |||||||||||||
A report from the RPM summitA report from the RPM summitPosted Oct 9, 2009 15:48 UTC (Fri) by nevyn (subscriber, #33129)In reply to: A report from the RPM summit by ballombe Parent article: A report from the RPM summit
I don't believe I've replied to any of your comments.
In regards to my description of joey's comment ... sure, whatever. Next time there's an article on dpkg I'll respond implying that dpkg is just catching up to 15 year old rpm features, and dismiss everything else as pointless. Anyone who responds and doesn't agree with my tone will obviously be a "self righteous meta-troll".
(Log in to post comments)
Trolling? Posted Oct 10, 2009 11:17 UTC (Sat) by man_ls (subscriber, #15091) [Link] You get easily offended. I guess that what triggered your meta-trolling was the first sentence:Just a quick look at their planned features compared to what's in dpkg already:which I suppose may seem like derogatory or condescending if you have some sort of inferiority complex. You can also see it as "let's have a look at the planned features and see if they can usefully added to our package format". Probably there are some features in rpm that are not in dpkg, but that was not the subject of the message. One of the requirements of trolling is to beg for attention, which was not the case here. The original message was also quite informative. Wait a minute, am I meta-feeding the meta-troll?
|
|||||||||||||