fixed in v22.214.171.124, also caught by StackProtector
Posted Sep 26, 2009 13:16 UTC (Sat) by mingo
In reply to: fixed in v126.96.36.199, also caught by StackProtector
Parent article: Kernel release status
So I have the answer to my question above then: "Is it the case that yourself, Paul Mackerras, Xiao Guangrong, Greg Kroah-Hartman, Peter Zijlstra, Eugene Teo and the other members of oss-security *ALL* can not plainly see that trivial, classic stack overflows, like the one signed-off on the fix for, are exploitable for arbitrary code execution? Did you all really believe that it was purely a "kernel crash" as noted in the commit message you all reviewed and signed off on?"
Yes, it indeed happens.
I take responsibility for this having slipped through (i should have caught it), and let me defend those other hard working people, who take an active part in the upstream kernel development process. Yes, nobody is infallible, and no, i dont think your repeated attempts to ridicule them is fair or justified.
If you think you could do better then i'd invite you to take part in the process instead of taking pot shots at it externally. Otherwise you'll never know whether you could do better than those whom you attack so viciously.
The fundamental question there (if you care): are you able to participate in a constructive community? Judging by your messages your life seems to be defined by hatred.
to post comments)