| |||||||||||||
AppArmor: it's baaaaaaackAppArmor: it's baaaaaaackPosted Sep 24, 2009 8:08 UTC (Thu) by smurf (subscriber, #17840)In reply to: AppArmor: it's baaaaaaack by arjan Parent article: AppArmor: it's baaaaaaack "It's" → "Its". Sigh.
(Log in to post comments)
AppArmor: it's baaaaaaack Posted Sep 25, 2009 2:29 UTC (Fri) by knobunc (subscriber, #4678) [Link]
In the topic title? No... it's is correct. "It's" is a contraction of "it is", so since the topic is "AppArmor: it is baaaaaaaack" that is correct. "Its" is possessive, so would mean the article was about the back of AppArmor.
-ben
AppArmor: it's baaaaaaack Posted Sep 25, 2009 3:34 UTC (Fri) by smurf (subscriber, #17840) [Link]
No, not in the title -- sorry, should have clarified that.
The error is in the sentence "It's pathname-based approach
".
AppArmor: it's baaaaaaack Posted Sep 25, 2009 13:24 UTC (Fri) by knobunc (subscriber, #4678) [Link]
Ah. Sorry!!
|
|||||||||||||