| |||||||||||||
AppArmor: it's baaaaaaackAppArmor: it's baaaaaaackPosted Sep 24, 2009 6:43 UTC (Thu) by arjan (subscriber, #36785)Parent article: AppArmor: it's baaaaaaack
you should have know.
the yearly apparmor-to-lkml posting tends to be 3 weeks before kernel summit...
the conspiracy theorist in me says that this is on purpose to be able to claim at KS that they are relevant. But that's of course bogus, there must be some other argument ;-)
(Log in to post comments)
AppArmor: it's baaaaaaack Posted Sep 24, 2009 8:08 UTC (Thu) by smurf (subscriber, #17840) [Link] "It's" → "Its". Sigh.
AppArmor: it's baaaaaaack Posted Sep 25, 2009 2:29 UTC (Fri) by knobunc (subscriber, #4678) [Link]
In the topic title? No... it's is correct. "It's" is a contraction of "it is", so since the topic is "AppArmor: it is baaaaaaaack" that is correct. "Its" is possessive, so would mean the article was about the back of AppArmor.
-ben
AppArmor: it's baaaaaaack Posted Sep 25, 2009 3:34 UTC (Fri) by smurf (subscriber, #17840) [Link]
No, not in the title -- sorry, should have clarified that.
The error is in the sentence "It's pathname-based approach
".
AppArmor: it's baaaaaaack Posted Sep 25, 2009 13:24 UTC (Fri) by knobunc (subscriber, #4678) [Link]
Ah. Sorry!!
|
|||||||||||||