Posted Sep 22, 2009 13:54 UTC (Tue) by sebas (subscriber, #51660)
In reply to: KDE's Project Silk by coriordan
Parent article: KDE's Project Silk
I think a Free software implementation is actually the best way to ensure
that your wishes be respected. :)
The idea is not to make the user do something, but to make the computer
support better what many people are already doing with their data (and
devices in general).
Free software is our best bet, but our attention still needed
Posted Sep 23, 2009 13:10 UTC (Wed) by coriordan (guest, #7544)
[Link]
Free software is like democracy. Sometimes people elect dangerous idiots.
In free software projects, if the users don't clearly value freedom, then companies add non-free plugins, non-free dependencies, and non-free websites to the free software systems.
I have the source and the freedom, but I don't have the time to reprogram my desktop. I have to rely on the users in general signalling to the developers that anti-privacy features and non-free dependencies are not what we want. This is worlds better than the situation of a user of proprietary software user, but it does take some daily effort.