| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
Notes from the SCO conference callNotes from the SCO conference callPosted Jun 7, 2003 0:17 UTC (Sat) by NerdlyMcGeek (guest, #8453)Parent article: Notes from the SCO conference call
I posted this previously with another article and was hoping to get some feedback.. Thanx McGeek Posted Jun 6, 2003 23:31 UTC (Fri) by NerdlyMcGeek) (Post reply) Darl McBride doesn't understand Linux (NewsForge) And not much about anything else.... It is interesting to note that Lindows made an agreement with SCO for this supposed "IP" some time ago. But they somehow just recently discovered this "IP" problem? I am very interesed as to exactly when did SCO shake down Lindows? Might I humbly suggest that the Lindows folks be issued a sopeona to testify in this regard. Should they have made an agreement prior to what SCO "claims" they became aware of these purported violations they not only loose their case but could face criminal prosecution for fraud as a result of manipulating this information with criminal intent. In the eyes of the Courts World over, omission and lies equate to the same thing.
(Log in to post comments)
|
|
||||||||||||