LWN.net Logo

The 2.6.31 kernel is out

The 2.6.31 kernel is out

Posted Sep 10, 2009 16:49 UTC (Thu) by mingo (subscriber, #31122)
In reply to: The 2.6.31 kernel is out by larryr
Parent article: The 2.6.31 kernel is out

This bug was reported 9 days ago - that's borderline even for trivial fixes and generally they dont make it upstream unless affecting a significant number of users.

Note how late it was apparently reported despite it being triggerable in -rc1 already [which was released on June 24th] - suggesting that it either was not critical enough for people to report sooner, or was not hit by enough people (or by the right people) to be reported in time.

(or somehow it was reported but did not get on the regression list. Cc: Rafael to make sure it gets on the regression list.)

Bugs that get reported in time and have trivial fixes do get fixed in the release.

Also note that if the fix is trivial it will go into v2.6.31.1 - which will be released at around the same time a delayed v2.6.31 would have been released. So there's no delay for you in terms of getting a fixed stable kernel.


(Log in to post comments)

The 2.6.31 kernel is out

Posted Sep 11, 2009 13:58 UTC (Fri) by ariveira (guest, #57833) [Link]

> Bugs that get reported in time and have trivial fixes do get fixed in the release.

Well I have reported this two releases ago and I'm still waiting XD

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13362

Maybe is just that my hard is foobared but it is annoying to carry the revert...

The 2.6.31 kernel is out

Posted Sep 11, 2009 19:15 UTC (Fri) by mb (subscriber, #50428) [Link]

> > Bugs that get reported in time and have trivial fixes do get fixed in the release.
> Well I have reported this two releases ago and I'm still waiting XD
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13362

I think you missed the "and have trivial fixes" part...

The 2.6.31 kernel is out

Posted Sep 11, 2009 19:37 UTC (Fri) by ariveira (guest, #57833) [Link]

A one line revert[1] is a trivial fix from my no developer point of view.
But I may be very well mistaken as I'm not a developer.

[1] And i have read multiple times that a regression with a bisected culprit
patch is an automatic revert. Seems like this policy only applies to some
regressions but no others.

Copyright © 2012, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds