LWN.net Logo

Advertisement

Front, Kernel, Security, Distributions, Development. See your byline here on LWN.net.

Advertise here

BFS vs. mainline scheduler benchmarks and measurements

BFS vs. mainline scheduler benchmarks and measurements

Posted Sep 9, 2009 10:08 UTC (Wed) by etienne_lorrain@yahoo.fr (guest, #38022)
In reply to: BFS vs. mainline scheduler benchmarks and measurements by jzbiciak
Parent article: BFS vs. mainline scheduler benchmarks and measurements

I also have some strange behaviour on a no-name dual core all intel portable PC, kind of 2-4 seconds where mouse is not even moving, without any load whatsoever, no log in /var/log/messages, completely random.
This portable PC is cheap and "designed for the other OS" system even if it was sold without anything installed: the DMI information is blank, the ACPI information does not seem to be better.
I tend to think that it is a SMM problem, instead of a scheduler problem, the crappy BIOS (cannot update because no DMI name) does not like Linux, or was explicitely designed to give a bad experience. I would really like to be wrong here.
There was a time when Linux did not rely on any BIOS, but it is no more (SMM cannot be disabled, even under Linux - what is what is handling the forced power off by pressing On/Off button for more than 3 seconds).


(Log in to post comments)

Copyright © 2012, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds