| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
Measuring on down-to-earth hardwareMeasuring on down-to-earth hardwarePosted Sep 7, 2009 22:30 UTC (Mon) by man_ls (subscriber, #15091)In reply to: BFS vs. mainline scheduler benchmarks and measurements by mingo Parent article: BFS vs. mainline scheduler benchmarks and measurements
Not likely - it took 8+ hours to do the quad core tests and a single kernel build iteration takes 1-2 hours on this box.Pity. It would be interesting to run your benchmarks on a PIII, even if it takes 5 days; or tune them to last less. Just about any current netbook would do too. Any takers? As a socratic exercise: just what would it prove if BFS performed better than CFS? And then, what would we learn if the reverse happened and CFS bested BFS?
(Log in to post comments)
|
|
||||||||||||