| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
BFS vs. mainline scheduler benchmarks and measurementsBFS vs. mainline scheduler benchmarks and measurementsPosted Sep 7, 2009 13:34 UTC (Mon) by da4089 (subscriber, #1195)In reply to: BFS vs. mainline scheduler benchmarks and measurements by drag Parent article: BFS vs. mainline scheduler benchmarks and measurements
At my office, everyone has an 8-core desktop.
At home, people tend to have single-socket, quad-core desktops. Laptops are mostly dual-core, although the last two guys who bought one got quad-core, 17" monsters.
So, I think Ingo was reasonable in his choice of platform.
(Log in to post comments)
BFS vs. mainline scheduler benchmarks and measurements Posted Sep 8, 2009 0:18 UTC (Tue) by awalton (subscriber, #57713) [Link]
> At home, people tend to have single-socket, quad-core desktops.
I want to live at your home. We've bought 4 new home PCs in the past two years, including one just a month ago. They're all dual cores. Even my brand new laptop is dual core.
|
|
||||||||||||