| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
BFS vs. mainline scheduler benchmarks and measurementsBFS vs. mainline scheduler benchmarks and measurementsPosted Sep 7, 2009 12:16 UTC (Mon) by fb (subscriber, #53265)In reply to: BFS vs. mainline scheduler benchmarks and measurements by flewellyn Parent article: BFS vs. mainline scheduler benchmarks and measurements
Yes, Con's response was outright rude. OTOH he had made clear that he wasn't interested in that kind of discussion.
However Ingo was obviously down the route of "lies & benchmarks". The point of the scheduler is low end machines, and responsiveness. Ingo posts a benchmark with ridiculously high-end machine, and measuring performance.
I just wish that Con had had the cool head to politely point that if you ask the wrong question, you get the wrong answer.
(Log in to post comments)
|
|
||||||||||||