| |||||||||||||
The offline schedulerThe offline schedulerPosted Sep 3, 2009 22:06 UTC (Thu) by razb (guest, #43424)In reply to: The offline scheduler by xoddam Parent article: The offline scheduler
:) I simply decided to stay low. I did not know it would irritate so many people.
raz
(Log in to post comments)
The offline scheduler Posted Sep 4, 2009 15:36 UTC (Fri) by mingo (subscriber, #31122) [Link] As far as i'm concerned the patches do not irritate me - why should they? (I dont find them upstream acceptable in their current form but hey, most of my own feature patches are not acceptable in their initial form either ;-) "Staying low" is the worst possibly strategy if you want to improve the upstream kernel. Engaging in the process and listening to upstream feedback and acting on suggestions is important.
|
|||||||||||||