Posted Sep 2, 2009 7:39 UTC (Wed) by patrick_g (subscriber, #44470)
[Link]
>>> Try meeting some more people. It's a whole world out there.
What is your solution?
Recompiling the kernel and lose all the advantages of a distribution kernel?
Use a server optimized kernel on your laptop?
Desktop Debian = Ubuntu
Posted Sep 2, 2009 13:00 UTC (Wed) by nye (guest, #51576)
[Link]
IIRC a couple of years back Con Kolivas had a feature to allow switching the scheduler at runtime, which was deemed a pointless feature and rejected.
Desktop Debian rocks
Posted Sep 2, 2009 8:32 UTC (Wed) by man_ls (subscriber, #15091)
[Link]
Alternatively, try finding out some hard data. For example, Debian's own popularity contest. Taking base admin packages as a baseline (83696), of which over 95% are regularly used, you may find that about 56% use X11 libraries regularly, about half installed desktop-base and 26% use metacity. GNOME is even more popular with 56% having installed gnome-keyring and 32% using it regularly. KDE is less popular with only 23% installing kdebase-data and 10% using any package regularly (interesting, didn't know there was such a disparity with GNOME), while XFCE shows up at 3.7%.
You might say that these are servers being admin'd graphically. Let us see typically desktop-y applications: quick browsing shows regular users of Firefox (iceweasel really) at 33%, libgstreamer at 27%, evince at 26%, libgphoto2 and openoffice both at 25%. To put these figures in perspective, Apache is at 44% and Samba at 27%.
There are lots of bias in the sample: only utter geeks would install popularity-contest, and only properly connected machines will show up. I would counter that both things pretty much describe Debian's audience. IMHO saying that 50% of Debian users have it as a desktop is a good estimation.