LWN.net Logo

Licensing Amateurs

Licensing Amateurs

Posted Aug 25, 2009 10:43 UTC (Tue) by pboddie (subscriber, #50784)
Parent article: Simon - speech activated user interface for KDE (KDE.News)

For all we can tell, the software and work that went into making HTK could be quite good, but the licensing is marred by the restrictive, amateur mentality that comes up again and again in academia: either people want to "commercialize" or "monetize" their research, or they want other people to use their stuff and yet maintain almost total control. Both of these things contradict the proper practice of scientific inquiry, of course, and large regions of academia would do well to discover how Free Software has enabled collaboration in a far more effective way than some of the tame and inefficient ways that some scientists seem to think is "state of the art" (undoubtedly prompted by their corporate overlords at their institutions' "intellectual property" offices).


(Log in to post comments)

Licensing Amateurs

Posted Aug 25, 2009 12:39 UTC (Tue) by droundy (subscriber, #4559) [Link]

This is something FFTW got right. Just license it as GPL, with an option to pay for a more restrictive license. It's totally open, and the university (MIT in this case) gets any licensing fees they would have gotten were it restrictively distributed. Copyleft works for you!

The only missing element is an attribution clause for research done with the software. That and the GPL isn't so helpful for research binaries (as opposed to libraries), as other researchers are unlikely to redistribute their modified code.

Copyright © 2013, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds