| |||||||||||||||||||||||
wordpress: multiple vulnerabilities
(Log in to post comments)
Broken links Posted Aug 28, 2009 12:10 UTC (Fri) by ajk (subscriber, #6607) [Link]
The CVE links in this and several other posts appear to be broken.
(I didn't find any email address where I could have reported this, so doing it publically.)
Broken links Posted Aug 28, 2009 13:11 UTC (Fri) by corbet (editor, #1) [Link] 1) They are working for me. The Mitre folks recently broke links to www.cve.mitre.org, but we fixed that a couple of days ago so you shouldn't have been seeing it.2) The LWN.net FAQ, as listed in the upper-right corner of the page, includes contact addresses.
Broken links Posted Aug 28, 2009 13:19 UTC (Fri) by ajk (subscriber, #6607) [Link]
The links on this page are working noticed that after posting. I noticed the problem on http://lwn.net/Articles/347814/ and (reasonably, I'd think) assumed that both pages are generated from the same data and thus would not differ on this.
As to the FAQ I did have a look there. Dunno why I missed the addresses.
Broken links Posted Aug 28, 2009 13:28 UTC (Fri) by corbet (editor, #1) [Link] Ah, OK, that was a caching problem on our end. We should have thought of that; fixed now.(But done with an obligatory grumble toward the mitre.org folks who broke URLs that have worked for years...)
Broken links Posted Aug 28, 2009 15:58 UTC (Fri) by ajk (subscriber, #6607) [Link]
I'm still seeing the broken links here, even though I've flushed my browser cache, done hard reloads and changed IP addresses (by going home from work) in between.
Broken links Posted Aug 28, 2009 16:05 UTC (Fri) by corbet (editor, #1) [Link] AAAAARRRRRRGH!OK, I know what the problem is. Now it's fixed. Really this time. Honest. I wouldn't mislead you on this. Trust me. Sorry for the confusion.
Broken links Posted Aug 28, 2009 16:16 UTC (Fri) by ajk (subscriber, #6607) [Link]
Confirmed. Thank you :)
Broken links Posted Aug 28, 2009 13:30 UTC (Fri) by jake (editor, #205) [Link]
> I noticed the problem on http://lwn.net/Articles/347814/ and (reasonably,
> I'd think) assumed that both pages are generated from the same data and > thus would not differ on this.
Hmm, the half-dozen CVE links I tried on the page you reference seemed to work just fine. You are right, they are generated from the same data, so it would be weird if some weren't working. Can you give a specific example?
thanks!
jake
Broken links Posted Aug 28, 2009 13:32 UTC (Fri) by jake (editor, #205) [Link]
Oops! Never mind ... :)
jake
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||