| |||||||||||||
On properly packaging perlOn properly packaging perlPosted Aug 21, 2009 22:06 UTC (Fri) by smoogen (subscriber, #97)In reply to: On properly packaging perl by Baylink Parent article: On properly packaging perl
It is in the same way Debian is the test sandbox for Ubuntu (or vice versa)... :) :)
(Log in to post comments)
On properly packaging perl Posted Aug 21, 2009 23:03 UTC (Fri) by BenHutchings (subscriber, #37955) [Link]
Debian unstable is the test sandbox for Debian and Ubuntu releases.
On properly packaging perl Posted Aug 22, 2009 5:28 UTC (Sat) by drag (subscriber, #31333) [Link]
and like Fedora it makes a kick-ass workstation/desktop OS.
It's just something that won't ever be mainstream and is dubious for production environment.
On properly packaging perl Posted Aug 22, 2009 8:03 UTC (Sat) by yoe (subscriber, #25743) [Link]
You are aware that Debian is used on 80.000 systems in the Extramadura region in Spain, right?
You are aware that Debian is used on several thousand systems in Munich too, right?
You are aware that the servers of Second Life all run Debian, right?
These are just the three first examples I could come up with off the top of my head. They all sound pretty 'mainstream' and 'production' to me.
I'm not saying Debian Rulez the World, but saying "won't ever be mainstream and is dubious for production" is just trolling.
On properly packaging perl Posted Aug 22, 2009 8:13 UTC (Sat) by xanni (subscriber, #361) [Link]
Did you miss the word "unstable" after "Debian"?
On properly packaging perl Posted Aug 29, 2009 18:55 UTC (Sat) by dirtyepic (subscriber, #30178) [Link]
sssh. he's busy aggrandizing.
On properly packaging perl Posted Aug 22, 2009 8:15 UTC (Sat) by Sho (subscriber, #8956) [Link]
He meant Debian's *unstable* branch, afaict.
|
|||||||||||||