Re: [PATCH 2/7] kfifo: move out spinlock
[Posted August 19, 2009 by jake]
| From: |
| Alan Cox <alan-AT-lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> |
| To: |
| Stefani Seibold <stefani-AT-seibold.net> |
| Subject: |
| Re: [PATCH 2/7] kfifo: move out spinlock |
| Date: |
| Mon, 17 Aug 2009 10:51:31 +0100 |
| Message-ID: |
| <20090817105131.244fb157@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> |
| Cc: |
| Andrew Morton <akpm-AT-linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel-AT-vger.kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd-AT-arndb.de>,
Andi Kleen <andi-AT-firstfloor.org>,
Amerigo Wang <xiyou.wangcong-AT-gmail.com>,
Joe Perches <joe-AT-perches.com> |
| Archive-link: |
| Article, Thread
|
> The question is: what do you expect? Should i provide a compat layer?
> Should i retiring my work?
Do what you think is right.
> Give me a solution for this dilemma. I see at this point no way if you
> insist for the spinlock to design a clean interface.
Then I won't insist.
Alan
(
Log in to post comments)
