| |||||||||||||
Privacy policies and Mozilla's compromised positionPrivacy policies and Mozilla's compromised positionPosted Aug 9, 2009 15:03 UTC (Sun) by AndreE (subscriber, #60148)In reply to: Privacy policies and Mozilla's compromised position by coriordan Parent article: Ubuntu's multisearch surprise
Forgive me for my ignorance, but I am currently using Adblock Plus, Better Privacy, and Torbutton addons downloaded from the Firefox site.
Are these addons rendered ineffective by some hardcoded usage sharing in Firefox?
(Log in to post comments)
Privacy policies and Mozilla's compromised position Posted Aug 9, 2009 21:26 UTC (Sun) by coriordan (guest, #7544) [Link] They work fine, and using them is a great idea. And because Firefox is free software, Mozilla can't prevent you from using them. The question is, why are these great plugins that protect user privacy not included in the default install? The answer is that Mozilla's funding comes almost exclusively from Google, and Google's business model is based on gather as much personal information about Internet users as possible. Tech savvy users like you and I are fine, we install plugins or switch to other software, but our parents and children will mostly install Mozilla's Firefox without any plugins, and they won't benefit from any of the privacy protection which is widely available.
Privacy policies and Mozilla's compromised position Posted Aug 10, 2009 15:12 UTC (Mon) by nick.lowe (guest, #54609) [Link]
As far as I am aware, there is no "hardcoded usage sharing in Firefox".
Firefox just has its default homepage set to http://www.google.com/firefox
Most of Mozilla's revenue derives from traffic sent to Google at that
Privacy policies and Mozilla's compromised position Posted Aug 12, 2009 2:26 UTC (Wed) by k8to (subscriber, #15413) [Link]
Keyword search helps them a certain amount more. It's not pure evil, but it is not obvious to this user when reviewing the mozilla install and interface that it phones home by default for every typo I make.
|
|||||||||||||