| |||||||||||||
The realtime preemption endgameThe realtime preemption endgamePosted Aug 5, 2009 22:17 UTC (Wed) by tertium (subscriber, #56169)In reply to: The realtime preemption endgame by tertium Parent article: The realtime preemption endgame
Indeed, it seems I am: "code holding a spinlock" != "code spinning". My apologies.
By the way, in your scenario (if I'm not off the mark again) at the step 5, the task A wouldn't spin, since B isn't running. Instead, A would block immediately, awakening B and taking the lock.
(Log in to post comments)
The realtime preemption endgame Posted Aug 5, 2009 22:47 UTC (Wed) by PaulMcKenney (subscriber, #9624) [Link]
Exactly! :-)
|
|||||||||||||