LWN.net Logo

Notes from the Montreal Linux Power Management Mini-Summit

Notes from the Montreal Linux Power Management Mini-Summit

Posted Aug 3, 2009 22:13 UTC (Mon) by drag (subscriber, #31333)
In reply to: Notes from the Montreal Linux Power Management Mini-Summit by elanthis
Parent article: Notes from the Montreal Linux Power Management Mini-Summit

I doubt it's mostly for power savings.

Remember that typically with mainframe applications they charge money based on MIPS cycles. So that the more processor you have the more everything costs. So in a efficiently running mainframe environment with proper setup and accounting you should be running at about 100% cpu 24/7 in order to get the best value.

They are not like PCs were you have the user or I/O as a bottleneck and the CPU spends most of it's time idle... Mainframes tend to have massive amount of I/O and relatively little CPU.

I would still like to have suspend-to-disk capabilities in a mainframe environment however. For various hardware issues and whatnot you do need to plan for downtime occasionally. By being able to suspend the Linux systems to disk then that reduces the downtime. Instead of needlessly wasting CPU time booting up and initializing the system you just load up the memory snapshot, which should be almost always much faster in a system like that.


(Log in to post comments)

Notes from the Montreal Linux Power Management Mini-Summit

Posted Aug 3, 2009 22:43 UTC (Mon) by ewan (subscriber, #5533) [Link]

There is also a fighting that someone just did it because it's cool.

Notes from the Montreal Linux Power Management Mini-Summit

Posted Aug 4, 2009 16:09 UTC (Tue) by ewan (subscriber, #5533) [Link]

Um. 'Fighting chance', that is. Drat.

Copyright © 2013, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds