Not logged in
Log in now
Create an account
Subscribe to LWN
Pencil, Pencil, and Pencil
Dividing the Linux desktop
LWN.net Weekly Edition for June 13, 2013
A report from pgCon 2013
Little things that matter in language design
Actually, most VServers don't need much boot and/or system-level stuff.
You could say it runs only starts/runs those scripts which usually get run at init level 2 or 3.
VServers don't handle anything them selfs, like mounting /tmp or setting up networking. The /dev directory is mostly empty only null and zero and stuff like are needed.
Yes, going from physical to vserver might be more work (stripping out stuff you don't need). I've never seen any problems with kernel-dependencies.
Posted Aug 2, 2009 5:29 UTC (Sun) by jlokier (guest, #52227)
It's also fine if you already have your apps set up to use it, naturally.
When it's less inviting is when the problem is to keep some old app working that's currently on a real machine running some old distro. KVM is quite good at making that work with minimal effort.
I put mail serving (anything other than a simple configuration) in the latter category, because these days a mail server is a fairly complex affair and will run alongside a couple of spam filtering daemons and virus filtering daemon and some delivery program or other, maybe also user's procmails and perhaps involving the IMAP service too, and undoubtedly depends on a few non-obvious files in /etc as well as the obvious ones. That's the sort of thing I mean by "if I don't have time to touch this now, I can't afford to be updating the OS on this server to a newer version". Repeated prior experience tells me such things break on OS upgrades and can take a long time to get working again with the same behaviour as before.
Copyright © 2013, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds