| |||||||||||||
PleasePleasePosted Jul 29, 2009 20:42 UTC (Wed) by corbet (editor, #1)In reply to: GNU + Linux = broken development model by nevyn Parent article: A tempest in a tty pot One might well disagree with the opinions expressed in the parent post, but it was not a troll. Please, let's try to avoid that kind of language and focus on the real issues, OK?
(Log in to post comments)
Please Posted Jul 30, 2009 5:17 UTC (Thu) by chad.netzer (✭ supporter ✭, #4257) [Link]
"GNU + Linux = broken development model". It should be no surprise that LWN readers (including many Linux developers) won't take kindly to their style of development being called "broken". That's a statement that requires some compelling evidence to back up; one is essentially saying Linux has progressed so far *in spite of* such a broken model.
Please Posted Aug 7, 2009 14:14 UTC (Fri) by efexis (guest, #26355) [Link]
The wrongness of one doesn't increase the rightness of another, and the politeness of another isn't a prerequisite for the politeness of oneself. I must say I rather see a single inpolite message in a thread than many, and many others here agree, which is why we prefer for people not to sink to squabble. I think it's fair enough to point that out. There's always LKML and slashdot for flamefests :-)
Please Posted Aug 12, 2009 4:25 UTC (Wed) by obi (guest, #5784) [Link]
I wish I could highlight your post; it cheers me up knowing at least some people understand this point. ;-)
Please Posted Jul 31, 2009 5:21 UTC (Fri) by Los__D (guest, #15263) [Link]
Did you look at the title?
|
|||||||||||||