| |||||||||||||
Then this vulnerability was only published because it was "spoiled goods"?Then this vulnerability was only published because it was "spoiled goods"?Posted Jul 20, 2009 11:20 UTC (Mon) by nix (subscriber, #2304)In reply to: Then this vulnerability was only published because it was "spoiled goods"? by khim Parent article: Linux 2.6.30 exploit posted
Well, since he just said elsewhere in this thread that's he's going to start selling RH vulnerabilities, one must assume the answer, this time, was no, but in future will be yes.
(Log in to post comments)
|
|||||||||||||