Then this vulnerability was only published because it was "spoiled goods"?
Posted Jul 20, 2009 5:38 UTC (Mon) by khim
In reply to: Linux 2.6.30 exploit posted
Parent article: Linux 2.6.30 exploit posted
Customers of that legitimate purchaser get a copies of fully-
working exploits (not PoCs) for vulnerabilities that are
Does it mean that vulnerabilities like discussed one are only ever
disclosed when they can not be sold? This time fix was introduced before the
exploit (sure it was not included in -stable relase, but it was in git-head
already), so it was impossible to sell it to "legitimate purchaser"?
to post comments)