| |||||||||||||
undefined behaviourundefined behaviourPosted Jul 17, 2009 20:58 UTC (Fri) by stevenb (guest, #11536)In reply to: undefined behaviour by ehabkost Parent article: Linux 2.6.30 exploit posted
That is what you say.
When GCC makes that the default behavior, there will be others bashing GCC for not optimizing away an obvious unnecessary null-pointer check.
Whatever GCC does, there will always be folks around here and everywhere else who disagree with it. GCC bashing is just the favorite hobby of the entire FOSS developer community, it seems. Just sad...
(Log in to post comments)
|
|||||||||||||