MySQL and SAP - License change
Posted May 29, 2003 15:54 UTC (Thu) by
linuxbox (subscriber, #6928)
Parent article:
MySQL and SAP
The number of comments questioning the license change is certainly more than a "handful." It's most of the traffic on the SAPDB general list, over the past 2 days.
And I think unilateral license changes of this type should be viewed with much more critical concern than this summary displays.
While good for MySQL AB, I suspect this change is harmful to most users of the software. The claim that MySQL's growth reflects the soundness of this licensing strategy (from the client/consumer viewpoint) is specious--because most commercial usrs of MySQL probably misunderstand the licensing, are in violation, and would not be using it if they realized they must by MySQL licenses.
Imagine if Linux were free to use "as is," but required commercial licenses from Linus when you wanted to use it in connection with non-GPL'd software. While the FSF might consider Linux more free in that case, in practice, there would be no mainstream use of Linux under those licensing provisions.
The same reasoning applies to GPL licensing of client interfaces for a key infrastructure services like a client/server RDBMS. Even if those licenses are priced affordably today, there is _no_ way to predict the cost of the same licenses in the future. Hence the future value of commercial software linked with MySQL depends on the future behavior and ownership of one company--a company that could be sold, leave business, or change its practices in ways harmful to the users of its software.
I for one think of this as a bad-faith move from the commercial stewards of SAPDB.
(
Log in to post comments)