Posted Jul 10, 2009 14:07 UTC (Fri) by regala (subscriber, #15745)
[Link]
do you plan on saying anything relevant ?
Life is unfortunately too short to do everything
Posted Jul 10, 2009 16:03 UTC (Fri) by dougsk (subscriber, #25954)
[Link]
I think he did. See Section 2d.
Life is unfortunately too short to do everything
Posted Jul 10, 2009 17:11 UTC (Fri) by ballombe (subscriber, #9523)
[Link]
This section is irrelevant since it does not apply to the sole copyright holder.
Life is unfortunately too short to do everything
Posted Jul 10, 2009 18:27 UTC (Fri) by dlang (✭ supporter ✭, #313)
[Link]
this would only be relevant if lwn decided to use this license for their code.
since they have not done so, pointing out that if they used a particular license they would be required to release the code running on their website is not relevant.
Life is unfortunately too short to do everything
Posted Jul 10, 2009 21:15 UTC (Fri) by skvidal (subscriber, #3094)
[Link]
Wow, I thought it was relevant b/c it is a license which more people who care about freesoftware who write web apps should use. It empowers the user of the app. It promotes openness.