| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
Did Microsoft get what they paid for?Did Microsoft get what they paid for?Posted May 29, 2003 7:08 UTC (Thu) by ronaldcole (guest, #1462)Parent article: The SCO case gets weirder After all these revelations, exactly what is Microsoft expecting to get for their recent $10-million purchase?
(Log in to post comments)
Did Microsoft get what they paid for? Posted May 29, 2003 9:36 UTC (Thu) by pavel (subscriber, #7318) [Link] That's what I'd really love to find out. Because if it turns out that Microsoft simply poured fuel into the FUD fire by arranging a bogus "IP transfer", I wonder if they can't find themselves sued for anti-competetive behaviour ;-)Gosh, this whole thing is more hilarious with every single day that passes!
Did Microsoft get what they paid for? Posted May 29, 2003 13:08 UTC (Thu) by gleef (guest, #1004) [Link] $9.5 million dollars to Novell? ;-)
Did Microsoft get what they paid for? Posted Jun 5, 2003 17:45 UTC (Thu) by mmarq (guest, #2332) [Link] NO, NO, NO,... for one thing that everybody can agree Bill M$ is not a foul!...THEY ONLY PAYED """AFTER""" THEY GOT THE GOODS!!!... you cannot find a lawsuit filling more full of anger, prejudice, and false subjective claims, against Linux, than the one SCO vs IBM, as you can see here http://www.sco.com/scosource/complaint3.06.03.html it starts to be clear that all this *deal* was long and carefully crafted and that it was a real bargain to M$.
|
|
||||||||||||