LWN.net Logo

Release management issues

Release management issues

Posted May 29, 2003 1:31 UTC (Thu) by arcticwolf (guest, #8341)
Parent article: Release management issues

Hasn't Marcelo said that the release process would speed up considerably after 2.4.20 was released, too? I don't want to belittle his efforts in putting out the best and most stable kernel he can in any way, but it certainly does seem that he's not able to handle the workload (for whatever reason). Accepting a helping hand would be no shame at all.


(Log in to post comments)

Release management issues

Posted Jun 5, 2003 8:30 UTC (Thu) by MLKahnt (subscriber, #6642) [Link]

I suspect that it may be more notable at this point because people are waiting for an official kernel, post-ptrace security escalation problem. Marcelo's official kernels, once released, have been solid, and the presence of -pre## editions have also helped to ensure that bad oversights don't slip through as official kernels, and I do cut him much slack given that, unlike Alan Cox, he hasn't been doing this for years, so it may not be automatically second nature for him yet.

It is just that some of us are not as comfortable applying a patch to the kernel for a security problem, for fear of doing it wrong and getting at best code that doesn't build, at worst code that builds and runs fine, and opens the system wider than ever for unauthorised exploitation. I know that I'd rather have a kernel *done right* that I can build appropriately for my systems.

Copyright © 2008, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds