| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
Novell challenges SCO's Unix claims (CBS MarketWatch)Novell challenges SCO's Unix claims (CBS MarketWatch)Posted May 28, 2003 21:27 UTC (Wed) by neoprene (guest, #8520)Parent article: Novell challenges SCO's Unix claims (CBS MarketWatch) SCO: how low can go? http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=SCOX&d=c&k=c1&a=v&p=s&t=1d&l=on&z=m&q=l Microsoft: you just gave 95% of that license money to Novell, your old buddies. Novell: is this BS a violation of that distribution contract with SCO? Can that License be revoked?
(Log in to post comments)
Novell challenges SCO's Unix claims (CBS MarketWatch) Posted May 28, 2003 21:47 UTC (Wed) by torsten (guest, #4137) [Link] Clickable Link.
Novell challenges SCO's Unix claims (CBS MarketWatch) Posted May 29, 2003 2:21 UTC (Thu) by proski (subscriber, #104) [Link] I don't think the stock price is a valid argument. How would you explain this comparison between SCO and Red Hat? SCO shares still trade well above their prices two months ago.
Stock comparisons (while we're on the subject) Posted May 29, 2003 5:22 UTC (Thu) by rjamestaylor (guest, #339) [Link] speaking of comparisons: RHAT vs MSFT vs the broad market over the past year (assuming $1 purchase in each "stock" one year ago today). No wonder Ballmer sold so much the other day ;)
Stock comparisons (while we're on the subject) Posted May 31, 2003 2:16 UTC (Sat) by Baylink (subscriber, #755) [Link] Ah... people who know how to manhandle the tools. Thanks, dude. Informative...
Novell challenges SCO's Unix claims (CBS MarketWatch) Posted May 31, 2003 16:35 UTC (Sat) by jdthood (guest, #4157) [Link] > Microsoft: you just gave 95% of that license money to> Novell, your old buddies. As I understand it, that is not true: SCO gets to keep all
|
|
||||||||||||