Re: [GIT PULL] Performance Counters for Linux
[Posted July 1, 2009 by jake]
| From: |
| Christoph Hellwig <hch-AT-infradead.org> |
| To: |
| Linus Torvalds <torvalds-AT-linux-foundation.org> |
| Subject: |
| Re: [GIT PULL] Performance Counters for Linux |
| Date: |
| Thu, 11 Jun 2009 14:51:17 -0400 |
| Message-ID: |
| <20090611185117.GA27411@infradead.org> |
| Cc: |
| David Newall <davidn-AT-davidnewall.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg-AT-cs.helsinki.fi>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch-AT-infradead.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra-AT-chello.nl>,
Al Viro <viro-AT-zeniv.linux.org.uk>, Ingo Molnar <mingo-AT-elte.hu>,
"David S. Miller" <davem-AT-davemloft.net>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian-AT-googlemail.com>,
linux-kernel-AT-vger.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus-AT-samba.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm-AT-linux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx-AT-linutronix.de> |
| Archive-link: |
| Article, Thread
|
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 11:21:46AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> But I note (once more) how _nobody_ has actually been able to accept the
> fact that oprofile was an abject failure as it was split up. Instead, you
> all dance around totally irrelevant issues.
I don't think oprofile has been a desaster because of any kind of split,
but because the design has been a failure from day 1.
(
Log in to post comments)
