| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
VFAT patent avoidance and patent workaroundsVFAT patent avoidance and patent workaroundsPosted Jun 30, 2009 16:59 UTC (Tue) by drag (subscriber, #31333)In reply to: VFAT patent avoidance and patent workarounds by dgm Parent article: VFAT patent avoidance and patent workarounds
No. If your arguing that a patch doesn't work around a patent then essentially your admiting that you've read the implimentation and that you know your currently violating it.
That's the only way that a judge is going to interpret that.
It's just logical. How is somebody going to 'poke holes' in a patent-workaround when they don't even know the patent itself?
(Log in to post comments)
VFAT patent avoidance and patent workarounds Posted Jun 30, 2009 19:09 UTC (Tue) by jordanb (subscriber, #45668) [Link]
When did being knowledgeable or informed become a prerequisite for having an opinion on the internet?
|
|
||||||||||||