| |||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
NetworkManager and ConnMan (Dan Williams' Blog)NetworkManager and ConnMan (Dan Williams' Blog)Posted Jun 26, 2009 2:29 UTC (Fri) by russell (subscriber, #10458)In reply to: NetworkManager and ConnMan (Dan Williams' Blog) by marcH Parent article: NetworkManager and ConnMan (Dan Williams' Blog)
Some of Dan's claimed features such as "integration" have never worked on fedora. I keep trying with each release but...
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491449
without this, a system wide connection seems impossible ( which is ridiculous ). How is ntpd, sshd, etc suppose work without anyone logged in?
(Log in to post comments)
NetworkManager and ConnMan (Dan Williams' Blog) Posted Jun 26, 2009 8:13 UTC (Fri) by cyperpunks (subscriber, #39406) [Link]
Even better if you need net to login (e.g. NIS or LDAP auth)...
How hard can it be to understand that if you have put a network cable into the machine you want to have network connection?
NetworkManager and ConnMan (Dan Williams' Blog) Posted Jul 6, 2009 13:55 UTC (Mon) by stevem (subscriber, #1512) [Link]
See http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=532670 for an example of why we've had to remove NM from most of the desktops at my company.
NetworkManager and ConnMan (Dan Williams' Blog) Posted Jun 26, 2009 11:01 UTC (Fri) by dcbw (guest, #50562) [Link]
People still wanted a way to make NetworkManager ignore an interface. That's what happened in that bug. NM_CONTROLLED=no was set in the ifcfg file, and thus NM ignores the interface just like the user requested.
Were NM_CONTROLLED not present or "yes", NM would be able to control that interface and bring it up before login.
|
|
||||||||||||