>> Like other Lisp implementations, Clojure is interpreted
Ah, careful, you'll get a lot of Lispers' backs up with that one. Modern Lisps like Common Lisp and Scheme are not "interpreted". They are interactive, but most of them include compilers; the Common Lisp standard requires a minimal compiler, in fact, and many CL implementations don't have interpreters at all, instead compiling code as it's read in (to bytecode or machine code, depending).
Clojure - many Lisp implementations compiled, syntax alternatives
Posted Jun 8, 2009 15:30 UTC (Mon) by flewellyn (subscriber, #5047)
[Link]
Personally, I find the parens much less difficult to deal with than the soup of braces, brackets, angle-brackets, semicolons, and the like that you get with languages like C++, Java, or C#. And the fact that there is no operator precedence (because there is no infix) means that there is no precedence lossage, and I can tell at a glance which operators will be called just by their position, without having to remember precedence rules.
Granted, the parens would be hard to keep track of without a good editor like Emacs, but I find the same to be true of other languages, be they braces-and-semicolon languages like C\C++\Java\PHP\Javascript\whatever, or whitespace-significant like Python. A good editor is essential no matter what.