Posted Jun 3, 2009 16:40 UTC (Wed) by arjan (subscriber, #36785)
Parent article: Xen again
The most concern is the hypervisor <-> Kernel ABI, not a Kernel <-> Userspace ABI. The hypervisor isn't a userspace component; it's more the other way around: The Linux kernel is the "userspace" of Xen.
Posted Jun 3, 2009 17:56 UTC (Wed) by aigarius (subscriber, #7329)
[Link]
Yes, but for a kernel developer anything out of Linux (whether higher in the food chain or lower) is 'userspace'. Even BIOS. Whne people say that Kernel<->Userspace interface is set in stone, they really mean Kernel<->Anything-that-is-not-the-kernel.
Xen again: which ABI
Posted Jun 3, 2009 23:39 UTC (Wed) by mjg59 (subscriber, #23239)
[Link]
That's not the case. We've broken the Linux <-> BIOS interface several times in ACPI, though admittedly every time it's been to make ourselves look more like Windows.